jip835 wrote:
just wanted to put out there that if a dog would have a "side effect" or "organ damage" just remember you can not go back on the manufacturer of the "shrub product" because it is not labeled for use in dogs. if you were to use an "expensive" flea product from the vet it is label for use in dogs and if it did not work or caused a problem with the dog you can contact the manufacturer of that product and get reimbursed. not only could that home made flea product be dangerous to your pet but also to you, your children, and anyone else that comes in contact with it. i would be careful.
Imidachloriprid,sp/ is what got labeled . If imidichloriprid got labeled through EPA ?then, if imidachloriprig barrel full got shipped to and expensive hallelujah sanctioned "good to go" manufacturer. Versus got into a garden supply ??? do you see what we mean? Yes , you are right , tree and shub is not labeled for fleas on dogs. Check out Salt. salt is not labeled to make food taste better.
So, if I have this right? You would be willing to pay $35 for a prduct that would cost $0.35. Now, we could look at the difference of $34.65 as a built in insurance policy similar to obamma care . the product is safe enough so do you like the overcharging insurance companies that good to point that crap out to us?????